On Feb 7, 2014, at 4:17 PM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com<mailto:rbry...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 02/06/2014 08:47 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Dina Belova wrote: Perhaps we should start putting each project on the TC agenda for a review of its current standing. For any gaps, I think we should set a specific timeframe for when we expect these gaps to be filled. Really good idea. New requirements are great, but frankly speaking not all currently integrated projects fit all of them. Will be nice to find out all gaps there and fix them asap. Agreed. I propose we do this in future TC meetings, time permitting. I propose we start with projects where the PTL was also elected to the TC, so that we give this new review's process some mileage. So.. Nova, Cinder, Neutron ? Sounds good to me. How about we do them in the order you specified. I'll go ahead and put together a wiki page that discusses the state of Nova against the requirements to help the review along. John and Mark, do you think you could do the same for Cinder/Neutron at some point in the next couple weeks? Yep. I have some time to put together a wiki page for this. mark
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev