Harshad,

I tried to find some discussion around this blueprint.
Could you provide us with some notes or threads  ?

Also, about the code review you mention. which one are you talking about :
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40071/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49470/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53171

because they are all abandoned.

Could you point me to the code, and update the BP because it seems that the 
links are not correct.

Thanks,

JC
On Feb 16, 2014, at 9:04 AM, "Allamaraju, Subbu" <su...@subbu.org> wrote:

> Harshad,
> 
> Thanks for clarifying.
> 
>> We started looking at this as some our customers/partners were interested in 
>> get AWS API compatibility. We have this blueprint and code review pending 
>> for long time now. We will know based on this thread wether the community is 
>> interested. But I assumed that community was interested as the blueprint was 
>> approved and code review has no -1(s) for long time now.
> 
> Makes sense. I would leave it to others on this list to chime in if there is 
> sufficient interest or not.
> 
>> To clarify, a clear incremental path from an AWS compatible API to an 
>> OpenStack model is not clear.
>> 
>> In my mind AWS compatible API does not need new openstack model. As more 
>> discussion happen on JC's proposal and implementation becomes clear we will 
>> know how incremental is the path. But at high level there two major 
>> differences
>> 1. New first class object will be introduced which effect all components
>> 2. more than one project can be supported within VPC.
>> But it does not change AWS API(s). So even in JC(s) model if you want AWS 
>> API then we will have to keep VPC to project mapping 1:1, since the API will 
>> not take both VPC ID and project ID.
>> 
>> As more users want to migrate from AWS or IaaS providers who want compete 
>> with AWS should be interested in this compatibility.
> 
> IMHO that's a tough sell. Though an AWS compatible API does not need an 
> OpenStack abstraction, we would end up with two independent ways of doing 
> similar things. That would OpenStack repeating itself! 
> 
> Subbu
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to