On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:05:15 -0500 Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > In today's Nova meeting a new thought occurred. We already have Gerrit > which is good for reviewing things. It gives you detailed commenting > abilities, voting, and history. Instead of attempting (and usually > failing) on doing blueprint review in launchpad (or launchpad + an > etherpad, or launchpad + a wiki page) we could do something like > follows: > > 1. create bad blueprint > 2. create gerrit review with detailed proposal on the blueprint > 3. iterate in gerrit working towards blueprint approval > 4. once approved copy back the approved text into the blueprint (which > should now be sufficiently detailed) >
+1. I think this could really help avoid wasted work for API related changes in particular. Just wondering if we need step 4 - or if the blueprint text should always just link to either the unapproved patch for the text in gerrit, or the text in repository once it's approved. Updates to proposal would be proposed through the same process. Chris _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev