This is the one that Irena created: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pci_passthrough_cross_project
On 5/8/14, 4:33 PM, "Steve Gordon" <sgor...@redhat.com> wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >> > It would be nice to have an informal discussion / unconference session >> > before the actual summit session on SR-IOV. During the previous IRC >> > meeting, we were really close to identifying the different use cases. >> > There was a dangling discussion on introducing another level of >> > indirection between the vnic_types exposed via the nova boot API and >>how >> > it would be represented internally. It would be ideal to have these 2 >> > discussions converged before the summit session. >> >> What would be the purpose of doing that before the session? IMHO, a >> large part of being able to solve this problem is getting everyone up to >> speed on what this means, what the caveats are, and what we're trying to >> solve. If we do some of that outside the scope of the larger audience, I >> expect we'll get less interaction (or end up covering it again) in the >> session. >> >> That said, if there's something I'm missing that needs to be resolved >> ahead of time, then that's fine, but I expect the best plan is to just >> keep the discussion to the session. Afterwards, additional things can be >> discussed in a one-off manner, but getting everyone on the same page is >> largely the point of having a session in the first place IMHO. > >Right, in spite of my previous response...looking at the etherpad there >is nothing there to frame the discussion at the moment: > >https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-nova-sriov-support > >I think populating this should be a priority rather than organizing >another session/meeting? > >Steve _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev