On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 11:19 +0200, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: > On 06/05/2014 10:59 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > >> If I'm late to the party and the only one that this is news to, that is > >> fine. Sixteen additional repos seems like a lot of additional reviews > >> will be needed. > > > > One slightly odd thing about this is that these repos are managed by > > horizon-core, so presumably part of the Horizon program, but yet the > > repos are under the stackforge/ namespace. > > What would you propose instead? > Keeping them in repositories external to OpenStack, on github or > bitbucket sounds wrong. > Getting them under openstack/ doesn't sound good either, as the > projects they are packaging are not related to OpenStack. > > Have them be managed by someone else? Who?
If they're to be part of the Horizon program, I'd say they should be under openstack/. If not, perhaps create a new team to manage them. Mark. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev