On 05/29/2014 03:45 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote: > Forgive me if I'm misunderstanding, but those all look like repositories that > are strictly tracking upstreams. They're not maintained by the > Horizon/OpenStack developers whatsoever. Is this intentional/necessary? > > - Gabriel The permissions on all the new repositories require +A from horizon-core and tagging from horizon-ptl: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95716/4/modules/openstack_project/files/gerrit/acls/stackforge/xstatic.config
Anita. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Anita Kuno [mailto:ante...@anteaya.info] >> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:30 PM >> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][infra] Plan for the splitting of >> Horizon >> into two repositories >> >> On 05/28/2014 08:54 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> we plan to finally do the split in this cycle, and I started some >>> preparations for that. I also started to prepare a detailed plan for >>> the whole operation, as it seems to be a rather big endeavor. >>> >>> You can view and amend the plan at the etherpad at: >>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-split-plan >>> >>> It's still a little vague, but I plan to gradually get it more detailed. >>> All the points are up for discussion, if anybody has any good ideas or >>> suggestions, or can help in any way, please don't hesitate to add to >>> this document. >>> >>> We still don't have any dates or anything -- I suppose we will work >>> that out soonish. >>> >>> Oh, and great thanks to all the people who have helped me so far with >>> it, I wouldn't even dream about trying such a thing without you. Also >>> thanks in advance to anybody who plans to help! >>> >> I'd like to confirm that we are all aware that this patch creates 16 new >> repos >> under the administration of horizon-ptl and horizon-core: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95716/ >> >> If I'm late to the party and the only one that this is news to, that is fine. >> Sixteen additional repos seems like a lot of additional reviews will be >> needed. >> >> Thanks, >> Anita. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev