Active discussion at the gantt meeting this week, check out the log:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-07-01-15.00.log.html
--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
-----Original Message-----
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 7:48 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Gantt] Scheduler split status (updated)
On 07/10/2014 05:06 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ===
> tl;dr: Now that we agree on waiting for the split prereqs to be done,
> we debate on if ResourceTracker should be part of the scheduler code
> and consequently Scheduler should expose ResourceTracker APIs so that
> Nova wouldn't own compute nodes resources. I'm proposing to first come
> with RT as Nova resource in Juno and move ResourceTracker in Scheduler
> for K, so we at least merge some patches by Juno.
> ===
>
> Some debates occured recently about the scheduler split, so I think
> it's important to loop back with you all to see where we are and what
> are the discussions.
> Again, feel free to express your opinions, they are welcome.
Where did this resource tracker discussion come up? Do you have any references
that I can read to catch up on it? I would like to see more detail on the
proposal for what should stay in Nova vs. be moved. What is the interface
between Nova and the scheduler here?
--
Russell Bryant
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
