I blame MicroSoft, cut/paste didn't work so I had to manually type in the 
(wrong) URL.

--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786

-----Original Message-----
From: Sylvain Bauza [mailto:sba...@redhat.com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 9:05 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Gantt] Scheduler split status (updated)

Le 10/07/2014 16:32, Dugger, Donald D a écrit :
> Active discussion at the gantt meeting this week, check out the log:
>
>       
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-07-01-15
> .00.log.html


I would prefer to mention this week's meeting :
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-07-08-15.00.log.html


>
> --
> Don Dugger
> "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
> Ph: 303/443-3786
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 7:48 AM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Gantt] Scheduler split status 
> (updated)
>
> On 07/10/2014 05:06 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> ===
>> tl;dr: Now that we agree on waiting for the split prereqs to be done, 
>> we debate on if ResourceTracker should be part of the scheduler code 
>> and consequently Scheduler should expose ResourceTracker APIs so that 
>> Nova wouldn't own compute nodes resources. I'm proposing to first 
>> come with RT as Nova resource in Juno and move ResourceTracker in 
>> Scheduler for K, so we at least merge some patches by Juno.
>> ===
>>
>> Some debates occured recently about the scheduler split, so I think 
>> it's important to loop back with you all to see where we are and what 
>> are the discussions.
>> Again, feel free to express your opinions, they are welcome.
> Where did this resource tracker discussion come up?  Do you have any 
> references that I can read to catch up on it?  I would like to see more 
> detail on the proposal for what should stay in Nova vs. be moved.  What is 
> the interface between Nova and the scheduler here?
>
> --
> Russell Bryant
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to