On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Monty Taylor wrote:
The tl;dr is "it's like tox, except it uses docker instead of virtualenv" -
which means we can express all of our requirements, not just pip ones.
Oh thank god[1].
Seriously.
jogo started a thread about "what matters for kilo" and I was going
to respond with (amongst other things) "get containers into the testing
scene". Seems you're way ahead of me. Docker's caching could be a
_huge_ win here.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=om5rbtudzrg
across the project. Luckily, docker itself does an EXCELLENT job at handling
caching and reuse - so I think we can have a set of containers that something
in infra (waves hands) publishes to dockerhub, like:
infra/py27
infra/py26
I'm assuming these would get rebuilt regularly (every time global
requirements and friends are updated) on some sort of automated
hook?
Thoughts? Anybody wanna hack on it with me? I think it could wind up being a
pretty useful tool for folks outside of OpenStack too if we get it right.
Given availability (currently an unknown) I'd like to help with this.
--
Chris Dent tw:@anticdent freenode:cdent
https://tank.peermore.com/tanks/cdent
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
