Russell Bryant wrote: > On 09/12/2014 07:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> If you think this is wrong and think the "design summit suggestion" >> website is a better way to do it, let me know why! If some programs >> really can't stand the 'etherpad/IRC' approach I'll see how we can spin >> up a limited instance. > > I think this is fine, especially if it's a better reflection of reality > and lets the teams work more efficiently. > > However, one of the benefits of the old submission system was the > clarity of the process and openness to submissions from anyone. We > don't want to be in a situation where non-core folks feel like they have > a harder time submitting a session. > > Once this is settled, as long as the wiki pages [1][2] reflect the > process and is publicized, it should be fine. > > [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit > [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit/Planning
Yes, I'll document the new process and heavily publicize it, once I'm sure that's the way forward :) -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev