On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote:
> Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: > > Great writeup. I think there are some great concrete suggestions here. > > > > A couple more: > > > > 1. I think we need a better name for Layer #1 that actually represents > what the goal of it is: Infrastructure Services? > > 2. We need to be be open to having other Layer #1s within the community. > We should allow for similar collaborations and group focus to grow up as > well. Storage Services? Platform Services? Computation Services? > > I think that would nullify most of the benefits of Monty's proposal. If > we keep on blessing "themes" or special groups, we'll soon be back at > step 0, with projects banging on the TC door to become special, and > companies not allocating resources to anything that's not special. > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > Great stuff, mixed on point 2 raised by Vish but honestly I think that's something that could evolve over time, but I looked at that differently as in Cinder, SWIFT and some day Manilla live under a Storage Services umbrella, and ideally at some point there's some convergence there. Anyway, I don't want to start a rat-hole on that, it's kind of irrelevant right now. Bottom line is I think the direction and initial ideas in Monty's post are what a lot of us have been thinking about and looking for. I'm in!!
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
