On Sep 19, 2014, at 3:33 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote:
> Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: >> Great writeup. I think there are some great concrete suggestions here. >> >> A couple more: >> >> 1. I think we need a better name for Layer #1 that actually represents what >> the goal of it is: Infrastructure Services? >> 2. We need to be be open to having other Layer #1s within the community. We >> should allow for similar collaborations and group focus to grow up as well. >> Storage Services? Platform Services? Computation Services? > > I think that would nullify most of the benefits of Monty's proposal. If > we keep on blessing "themes" or special groups, we'll soon be back at > step 0, with projects banging on the TC door to become special, and > companies not allocating resources to anything that's not special. I was assuming that these would be self-organized rather than managed by the TC. Vish
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
