On 10/30/2014 04:53 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> > wrote: > >> Jay Pipes wrote: >>> On 10/29/2014 09:07 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: >>>> On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote: >>>>> Any chance we could use the opening to move either the Refstack >>>>> session or the logging session from their current joint (and >>>>> conflicting) time (15:40)? QA really would be appreciated at both. >>>>> And I'd really like to be at both. I'd say the Refstack one would go >>>>> better in the debug slot, as the API stuff is sort of related to the >>>>> logging. Switching with one of the 14:50 sessions might also work. >>>>> >>>>> Just hoping. I really want great participation at all of these >>>>> sessions. >>>> >>>> The "gate debugging" session is most likely going to be dropped at this >>>> point. I don't see a big problem with moving the refstack one to that >>>> slot (the first time). >>>> >>>> Anyone else have a strong opinion on this? >>> >>> Sounds good to me. >> >> Sounds good. >> > > With the "gate debugging" session being dropped due to being the wrong > format to be productive, we now need a new session. After looking over the > etherpad of proposed cross project sessions I think there is one glaring > omission: the SDK. In the "Kilo Cycle Goals Exercise" thread [0] having a > real SDK was one of the top answers. Many folks had great responses that > clearly explained the issues end users are having [1]. As for who could > lead a session like this I have two ideas: Monty Taylor, who had one of the > most colorful explanations to why this is so critical, or Dean Troyer, one > of the few people actually working on this right now. I think it would be > embarrassing if we had no cross project session on SDKs, since there > appears to be a consensus that the making life easier for the end user is a > high priority. > > The current catch is, the free slot is now at 15:40, so it would compete > with 'How to Tackle Technical Debt in Kilo,' a session which I expect to be > very popular with the same people who would be interested in attending a > SDK session.
I'm happy to lead this, to co-lead with Dean or to just watch Dean lead it - although I can promise in any format to start off the time period with some very colorful ranting. I think I'm less necessary in the tech debt session, as other than "yes, please get rid of it" I probably don't have too much more input that will be helpful. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev