On Fri, 7 Nov 2014, Collins, Sean wrote:

On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 02:16:52PM CET, Chris Dent wrote:
What I hope to have at the end of this process is a nicely commented
local.conf that I can post somewhere for people who want a similar
thing.

Yes, and I hope my patchset will accomplish this, I just need to make
changes to it based on both your feedback on the review, as well as
in-person discussions with Dean Troyer.

Awesome. Sorry about my tone in those comments. I was in the midst
of one the longer efforts to get things working (many edits to
lib/neutron, many dives in to `ip netns wtf`) and stumbled upon that
review and was initially \o/ and then :(.

It is currently adapted from notes for my multi-node lab that contains
dual interfaces and provider networking. I am working to address your
comments about using a single interface, although some additions may
need to be done to DevStack to add the public interface to the bridge
and re-assign the IP address, similar to what Nova-Network does.

I'll keep track of that review and if there are others that I can
test please give me a shout.

Thanks.

--
Chris Dent tw:@anticdent freenode:cdent
https://tank.peermore.com/tanks/cdent

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to