On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 07:44:24AM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 12/5/2014 7:41 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 11:05:28AM +1100, Michael Still wrote: > >>One of the things that happens over time is that some of our core > >>reviewers move on to other projects. This is a normal and healthy > >>thing, especially as nova continues to spin out projects into other > >>parts of OpenStack. > >> > >>However, it is important that our core reviewers be active, as it > >>keeps them up to date with the current ways we approach development in > >>Nova. I am therefore removing some no longer sufficiently active cores > >>from the nova-core group. > >> > >>I’d like to thank the following people for their contributions over the > >>years: > >> > >>* cbehrens: Chris Behrens > >>* vishvananda: Vishvananda Ishaya > >>* dan-prince: Dan Prince > >>* belliott: Brian Elliott > >>* p-draigbrady: Padraig Brady > >> > >>I’d love to see any of these cores return if they find their available > >>time for code reviews increases. > > > >What stats did you use to decide whether to cull these reviewers ? Looking > >at the stats over a 6 month period, I think Padraig Brady is still having > >a significant positive impact on Nova - on a par with both cerberus and > >alaski who you've not proposing for cut. I think we should keep Padraig > >on the team, but probably suggest cutting Markmc instead > > > > http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/nova-reviewers-180.txt > > > >+-----------------------------+----------------------------------------+----------------+ > >| Reviewer | Reviews -2 -1 +1 +2 +A +/- % | > >Disagreements* | > >+-----------------------------+----------------------------------------+----------------+ > >| berrange ** | 1766 26 435 12 1293 357 73.9% | > >157 ( 8.9%) | > >| jaypipes ** | 1359 11 378 436 534 133 71.4% | > >109 ( 8.0%) | > >| jogo ** | 1053 131 326 7 589 353 56.6% | > >47 ( 4.5%) | > >| danms ** | 921 67 381 23 450 167 51.4% | > >32 ( 3.5%) | > >| oomichi ** | 889 4 306 55 524 182 65.1% | > >40 ( 4.5%) | > >| johngarbutt ** | 808 319 227 10 252 145 32.4% | > >37 ( 4.6%) | > >| mriedem ** | 642 27 279 25 311 136 52.3% | > >17 ( 2.6%) | > >| klmitch ** | 606 1 90 2 513 70 85.0% | > >67 ( 11.1%) | > >| ndipanov ** | 588 19 179 10 380 113 66.3% | > >62 ( 10.5%) | > >| mikalstill ** | 564 31 34 3 496 207 88.5% | > >20 ( 3.5%) | > >| cyeoh-0 ** | 546 12 207 30 297 103 59.9% | > >35 ( 6.4%) | > >| sdague ** | 511 23 89 6 393 229 78.1% | > >25 ( 4.9%) | > >| russellb ** | 465 6 83 0 376 158 80.9% | > >23 ( 4.9%) | > >| alaski ** | 415 1 65 21 328 149 84.1% | > >24 ( 5.8%) | > >| cerberus ** | 405 6 25 48 326 102 92.3% | > >33 ( 8.1%) | > >| p-draigbrady ** | 376 2 40 9 325 64 88.8% | > >49 ( 13.0%) | > >| markmc ** | 243 2 54 3 184 69 77.0% | > >14 ( 5.8%) | > >| belliott ** | 231 1 68 5 157 35 70.1% | > >19 ( 8.2%) | > >| dan-prince ** | 178 2 48 9 119 29 71.9% | > >11 ( 6.2%) | > >| cbehrens ** | 132 2 49 2 79 19 61.4% | > >6 ( 4.5%) | > >| vishvananda ** | 54 0 5 3 46 15 90.7% | > >5 ( 9.3%) | > > > > > >Regards, > >Daniel > > > > FWIW, markmc is already off the list [1].
Ah yes, must be that russell needs to update the config file for his script to stop marking markmc as core. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev