The dashboard is really cool, although I had to fix the spelling error... Michael
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Joe Gordon <joe.gord...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Andrew Laski <andrew.la...@rackspace.com> > wrote: >> >> >> On 12/10/2014 04:41 PM, Michael Still wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications >>> after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve >>> had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and >>> haven’t kept up with the review workload. >>> >>> Therefore, I propose that Friday this week be a specs review day. We >>> need to burn down the queue of specs needing review, as well as >>> abandoning those which aren’t getting regular updates based on our >>> review comments. >>> >>> I’d appreciate nova-specs-core doing reviews on Friday, but its always >>> super helpful when non-cores review as well. A +1 for a developer or >>> operator gives nova-specs-core a good signal of what might be ready to >>> approve, and that helps us optimize our review time. >>> >>> For reference, the specs to review may be found at: >>> >>> >>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/nova-specs+status:open,n,z >>> >>> Thanks heaps, >>> Michael >>> >> >> It will be nice to have a good push before we hit the deadline. >> >> I would like to remind priority owners to update their list of any >> outstanding specs at >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-nova-priorities-tracking so they can >> be targeted during the review day. > > > > In preparation, I put together a nova-specs dashboard: > > https://review.openstack.org/141137 > > https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=project%3A%5Eopenstack%2Fnova-specs+status%3Aopen+NOT+owner%3Aself+NOT+label%3AWorkflow%3C%3D-1+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%252cjenkins+NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D-2%252cself+branch%3Amaster&title=Nova+Specs&&Your+are+a+reviewer%2C+but+haven%27t+voted+in+the+current+revision=reviewer%3Aself&Needs+final+%2B2=label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D2+NOT%28reviewerin%3Anova-specs-core+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-1%29+limit%3A100&Passed+Jenkins%2C+Positive+Nova-Core+Feedback=NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D2+%28reviewerin%3Anova-core+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D1%29+NOT%28reviewerin%3Anova-core+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-1%29+limit%3A100&Passed+Jenkins%2C+No+Positive+Nova-Core+Feedback%2C+No+Negative+Feedback=NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-1+NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D2+NOT%28reviewerin%3Anova-core+label%3ACode-Review%3E%3D1%29+limit%3A100&Wayward+Changes+%28Changes+with+no+code+review+in+the+last+7+days%29=NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D2+age%3A7d&Some+negative+feedback%2C+might+still+be+worth+commenting=label%3ACode-Review%3D-1+NOT+label%3ACode-Review%3D-2+limit%3A100&Dead+Specs=label%3ACode-Review%3C%3D-2 > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Rackspace Australia _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev