It is huawei-volume-ci that is on behalf of huawei 18000 iSCSI and huawei 18000 FC driver, not huawei-ci. I am sorry for these two ci names so similar.
And I think the point is: Does the requirement is really "a stable CI", and if one CI is not stable, can it make a exemption like NetApp FC drivers? I think this is the point. Thanks, Liu -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Mike Perez [mailto:thin...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2015年3月21日 2:28 收件人: jsbry...@electronicjungle.net; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 主题: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] May you reconsider about huawei driver? On 09:41 Fri 20 Mar , Jay S. Bryant wrote: > Mike, > > Looks like this removal may have been a mistake. We should readdress. This was not a mistake. As Walt has mentioned that CI run failed anyways. Also if you take a look at Huawei's CI reporting history, it's not that often AND not reliable [1]. This is not satisfactory meeting the requirements. If we're saying they're having networking issues from January to now, this really sounds like to me it was *not* a priority. [1] - https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:+huawei-ci+project:openstack/cinder,n,z -- Mike Perez __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
