On 04/22/2015 09:55 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 04/22/2015 09:46 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 22 April 2015 at 11:19, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello! >>>> >>>> A couple of things I've been working on lately are project governance >>>> issues as a TC member and also implementation of a new virtual >>>> networking alternative with a Neutron driver. So, naturally I started >>>> thinking about how the Neutron driver code fits in to OpenStack >>>> governance. >>>> >>>> There are basically two areas with a lot of movement related to this >>>> issue. >>>> >>>> 1) Project governance has moved to a "big tent" model [1]. The vast >>>> majority of projects that used to be in Stackforge are being folded in >>>> to a larger definition of the OpenStack project. Projects making this >>>> move meet the following criteria as being "one of us": >>> >>> >>> Is it sensible to assume that Stackforge is going away entirely at some >>> point in the future, and we'll have a single namespace - OpenStack? >>> >>> >> >> IMHO, I'm not sure what the StackForge designation means anymore now that >> we have the Big Tent. I obviously also don't have the authority to make the >> call on when it goes away however. > Moving everything from Stackforge into the OpenStack namespace is > something that Jim Blair has said he would like to see happen. There has > been no resolution or focused discussion on this exact point that has > been put before the TC that I have seen.
I think things are moving fast enough. We need to make sure all of the repos are properly captured under a team, but it seems momentum is picking up. This thread is part of that. -- Russell Bryant __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
