On 24 April 2015 at 16:50, Chris Friesen <chris.frie...@windriver.com> wrote:
> On 04/24/2015 07:26 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > > If you think it might be beneficial to adjust tooling to that these >> "contributions" get counted this is fine by me. I just wanted to point >> out that >> I do not consider those contributions at all (and btw it would be at >> least more >> polite to put a +1 rather than a -1). >> > > If you're asking a question to elicit information, then it's quite > possible you don't have enough information for a +1 yet. This makes sense in general. I was referring to the specific cases posed by Julien - curiosities, pedantry, or questions unrelated to the scope of the patch. Julien clarified that there actually questions which grant a -1, and surely never a +1. For instance the kind of "what if" questions listed by Doug. In this case it make sense for a reviewer to put a hold a patch while waiting for an answer. > > Chris > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
