On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Maish Saidel-Keesing <mais...@maishsk.com> wrote:
And perhaps it could also be a good idea to have developers deploy and > operate a highly available geographically dispersed OpenStack > implementation trying to adhere to a defined SLA? Many do. Don't forget that the two original projects that formed OpenStack were both from active deployments, one of which is still around and very active in the community in many ways. Most of the top contributors in terms of commits and code are from companies that are either operators themselves or directly support operators as a paid service. That said, there are also conflicting priorities as some companies and operators are focused on serving different markets and user bases. It seems like much of the division on priorities and implementation of "operator-requested" needs may be due to the perceptions caused by differing priorities? dt -- Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
