John Garbutt wrote: >> I support moving nova to intermediate release, but not this cycle. > > +1 > > My main motivation here is actually making it clear how useful a > milestone release can be to get access to a feature you really, really > need much more quickly. > > Its a shame its called a "beta", because I think the milestones are > more (production) useful than that. On the other had, they are also > worse than many "betas" you get (in terms of completed translations > and docs, etc). So maybe thats still the best label for the > milestones.
It's actually not called a "beta", it's called a "milestone" which is slightly less pejorative. The fact that the tag is using "b1" is more an artifact of the PEP440 limitations... -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
