On Tue, Sep 22, 2015, at 02:59 AM, Alan Pevec wrote: > 2015-09-21 16:12 GMT+02:00 Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com>: > > We're running a script right now to submit a change to every project with > > this change. The topic will be coverage-v4 > > stable/kilo has uncapped coverage>=3.6 do we patch-spam it or cap > coverage? > stable/juno has coverage>=3.6,<=3.7.1 If you do cap coverage you should use a rule like 'coverage>=3.6,<4.0' to allow for bug fix releases. I know its not likely that those will happen but we do need to get into a better habit of not using <= on upper bounds as they effectively prevent any bug fix releases from being used.
Clark __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
