It's the same number of patches. On 23 Sep 2015 4:42 am, "Matt Riedemann" <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > On 9/22/2015 4:59 AM, Alan Pevec wrote: > >> 2015-09-21 16:12 GMT+02:00 Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com>: >> >>> We're running a script right now to submit a change to every project with >>> this change. The topic will be coverage-v4 >>> >> >> stable/kilo has uncapped coverage>=3.6 do we patch-spam it or cap >> coverage? >> stable/juno has coverage>=3.6,<=3.7.1 >> >> Cheers, >> Alan >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > I'd vote for just capping at <4.0 on stable/kilo rather than doing a bunch > of patches there. > > -- > > Thanks, > > Matt Riedemann > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
