hi,

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 16 Oct 2015, at 10:50, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote:
>>
>> if i move fwaas tests from neutron to neutron-fwaas, [1]
>> is there easy way to run them together with the rest of neutron api tests
>> for gate-neutron-dsvm-api job?
>
> Before we jump in to reflect current gating status-quo, do we have a definite 
> answer why we want to keep the gate coupling in place? Can’t we leave the 
> fwaas api job for fwaas repo only? Do we think core is unstable enough to 
> justify additional coupling? Is core bad at handling backwards compatibility 
> when it comes to (re)moving code that is unneeded for the core repo?
>
> That may actually be a dumb question, so don’t hesitate to point out obvious 
> reasons to keep co-gating.

it sounds like a good question.
i tend to think fwaas jobs for fwaas repo only is good enough.

>
> Ihar
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to