> On Oct 19, 2015, at 5:33 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 16 Oct 2015, at 10:50, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com> wrote: >> >> if i move fwaas tests from neutron to neutron-fwaas, [1] >> is there easy way to run them together with the rest of neutron api tests >> for gate-neutron-dsvm-api job? > > Before we jump in to reflect current gating status-quo, do we have a definite > answer why we want to keep the gate coupling in place? Can’t we leave the > fwaas api job for fwaas repo only? Do we think core is unstable enough to > justify additional coupling? Is core bad at handling backwards compatibility > when it comes to (re)moving code that is unneeded for the core repo?
Core is absolutely dreadful at backwards compatibility (I’m talking recent history here.) The co-gate is necessary to guard against that at the moment. Thanks, doug > > That may actually be a dumb question, so don’t hesitate to point out obvious > reasons to keep co-gating. > > Ihar > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
