Tony Breeds wrote: > [...] > I understand that we want to keep the number of parallel meetings to a > minimum, > but is it time to add #openstack-meeting-5?
Some slots are taken by groups that have not been holding meetings for quite a long time. For good hygiene, I'd like us to clean those up /before/ we consider adding a new meeting channel. It might well still be necessary to create a new channel after the cleanup, but we need to do that first. It's a bit of a painful work (especially for teams without a clear meeting_id) so it's been safely staying at the bottom of my TODO list for a while... > [...] > Confusion > ========= > So this is really quite trivial. As you can see above we don't have an > #openstack-meeting-2 channel the ...-alt is clearly that, but still people are > confused. How would people feel about creating #openstack-meeting-2 and > making > it redirect to #openstack-meeting-alt? I'd rather standardize and rename -alt to -2 (i.e. redirect -alt to -2 on IRC, and bulk-change all meetings YAML from -alt to -2). -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
