On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:35:34AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Tony Breeds wrote: > > [...] > > I understand that we want to keep the number of parallel meetings to a > > minimum, > > but is it time to add #openstack-meeting-5? > > Some slots are taken by groups that have not been holding meetings for > quite a long time. For good hygiene, I'd like us to clean those up > /before/ we consider adding a new meeting channel. It might well still > be necessary to create a new channel after the cleanup, but we need to > do that first.
There is lots of hygiene stuff to do in the repo :) I'll see what I can come up with but at the very least it's going to require a bunch of people to +1 a review to drop their meeting ;P So there are 17 slots that are full so I'll look at them. If a slot hasn't been used this month I'll open a review to drop them (with appropriate CC's) I'll go through the other slots later as they're not blocking anything right now. > It's a bit of a painful work (especially for teams without a clear > meeting_id) so it's been safely staying at the bottom of my TODO list > for a while... Yeah and mine ;P > > [...] > > Confusion > > ========= > > So this is really quite trivial. As you can see above we don't have an > > #openstack-meeting-2 channel the ...-alt is clearly that, but still people > > are > > confused. How would people feel about creating #openstack-meeting-2 and > > making > > it redirect to #openstack-meeting-alt? > > I'd rather standardize and rename -alt to -2 (i.e. redirect -alt to -2 > on IRC, and bulk-change all meetings YAML from -alt to -2). I wanted to go the other way as it's slightly less impactful. Most people grok that '-alt' == '-2'. if we redirect from 2 -> alt it's only a few people that transparently get redirected. If we do it the other way around everyone already in -alt needs to move. That's arguing implementation, rather than objecting so I'll start the process of registering #openstack-meeting-2 which requires people to: a) not use it ; and b) everyone in there to leave. Registering only takes 30seconds, once people leave (and I'm awake). In order to be pro-active I'll register #openstack-meeting-5 so when we *do* need it the startup costs are smaller. The first thing I'll do after registering the channels is give @infra access. Yours Tony.
pgp8wZyQ3Mswy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
