Hi, In Vitrage[3] project, we would like to be notified on every alarm that is triggered, and respond immediately (e.g. by generating RCA insights, or by triggering new alarms on other resources). We are now in the process of designing our integration with AODH.
If I understood you correctly, you want to remove the notifications to the bus, but keep the alarm_actions in the alarm definition? I'd be happy to get some more details about the difference between these two approaches, and why do you think the notifications should be removed. [3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Vitrage Thanks, Ifat. > > From: liusheng [mailto:liusheng1...@126.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 4:32 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][aodh] The purpose of notification about > alarm updating > > Hi folks, > > Currently, a notification message will be emitted when updating an alarm > (state transition, attribute updating, creation), this > functionality was > added by change[1], but the change didn't describe any purpose. So I wonder > whether there is any usage of this > type of notification, we can get the whole details about alarm change by > alarm-history API. the notification is implicitly > ignored by default, because the "notification_driver" config option won't be > configured by default. if we enable this option in > aodh.conf and enable the "store_events" in ceilometer.conf, this type of > notifications will be stored as events. so maybe some > users want to aggregate this with events ? what's your opinion ? > > I have made a change try to deprecate this notification, see [2]. > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48949/ > [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/246727/ > > BR > Liu sheng __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
