On 14/01/16 11:07 +1100, Jake Yip wrote:
Hi all,I've recently ran across a constraint in glance-api while working with image locations. In essence, there is no way to customize ordering of image-locations other than the default location strategies, namely location_order and store_type [0]. It seems like a more generic method of ordering image locations is needed, IMHO. Some background - We are in a multi-cell environment and each cell has it's own glance-api server. All images are stored in a global swift cluster. We would like glance to be able to fetch images from a local store, so that we can do COW for backends like RBD. Unfortunately, none of the current location strategies works for us, as we might have multiple cells sharing the same backend. I've opened a bug / wishlist describing this issue [1]. I have also implemented code that allows us to achieve that based on image location metadata. I am wondering anyone else have solved this before? I would like to hear your opinions on how we can achieve this, and whether ranking it by metadata is the way to go. The current wishlist is now tracked as a spec-lite. Is this ok?
Yes, this sounds like a good example of a spec lite. We'll now proceed to review it, triage it and give a go if everything looks fine. As far as the feature goes, I think it is fine to add other location strategies. I'll follow-up on the bug. Flavio -- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
