On 01/19/2016 05:14 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
Rossella Sblendido <rsblend...@suse.com> wrote:
On 01/19/2016 04:36 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
Thinking of this, I had another idea, a bit raw yet.
But how does it sound to have two meetings a week, one in a EU/ASIA
friendlier
timezone, and another for USA/AU (current one), with different chairs.
We don't impose unnatural-working hours (too early, too late for
family, etc..)
to anyone, we encourage gathering as a community (may be split by
timezones, but
it feels more human and faster than ML conversations..) and also
people able
to make to both, could serve as bridges for both meetings.
Thoughts?
I think that is what Kyle was proposing and if I am not wrong that's
what they do in nova.
My understanding is that Kyle proposed to switch back to bi-weekly
alternating meetings, and have a separate chair for each.
You are right Ihar, I misread. I like Kyle's proposal better too.
Rossella
I think Kyle’s suggestion is wiser since it won’t leave the community
split into two separate parts, and it won’t waste two hours each week
where we could make it with just one.
Ihar
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
