On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
wrote:
<snip>

> I've replied on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/266095/ and the related
> cinder change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/272899/ which are adding a
> new key to the volume connector dict being passed around between nova and
> cinder, which is not ideal.
>
> I'd really like to see us start modeling the volume connector with
> versioned objects so we can (1) tell what's actually in this mystery
> connector dict in the nova virt driver interface and (2) handle version
> compat with adding new keys to it.
>

I agree with you.  Actually, I think it would be more correct to have
Cinder store it, and not pass it at all to terminate_connection().


-- 
*Avishay Traeger, PhD*
*System Architect*

Mobile: +972 54 447 1475
E-mail: avis...@stratoscale.com



Web <http://www.stratoscale.com/> | Blog <http://www.stratoscale.com/blog/>
 | Twitter <https://twitter.com/Stratoscale> | Google+
<https://plus.google.com/u/1/b/108421603458396133912/108421603458396133912/posts>
 | Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/company/stratoscale>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to