On 27 January 2016 at 06:40, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 1/27/2016 11:22 AM, Avishay Traeger wrote: > >> >> I agree with you. Actually, I think it would be more correct to have >> Cinder store it, and not pass it at all to terminate_connection(). >> >> > That would be ideal but I don't know if cinder is storing this information > in the database like nova is in the nova > block_device_mappings.connection_info column. > This is being discussed for cinder, since it is useful for implementing force detach / cleanup in cinder -- Duncan Thomas
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
