On 29 January 2016 at 20:36, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2016-01-29 19:34:01 +0000 (+0000), gordon chung wrote: >> hmm.. that's unfortunate... anything we need to update so this doesn't >> happen again? or just a matter of lesson learned, let's keep an eye out >> next time? > > Well, I backported the downloadcache removal to the stable/kilo > branch after discovering this issue, and while that's too late to > solve it for 2015.1.3 it will at least no longer prevent a 2015.1.4 > tarball from being built. > >> i guess the question is can users wait (a month?) for next release? i'm >> willing to poll operator list (or any list) to query for demand if >> that's easier on your end? if there's very little interest we can defer >> -- i do have a few patches lined up for next kilo release window so i >> would expect another release. > > I'm perfectly okay uploading a tarball I or someone else builds for > this, as long as it's acceptable to leadership from stable branch > management, Telemetry and the community at large. Our infrastructure > exists to make things more consistent and convenient, but it's there > to serve us and so we shouldn't be slaves to it.
Unless anyone else objects, I'd be really happy if you are willing to scp a handrolled tarball. I'm happy to help validate it's pristine-state locally here. Thanks Jeremy! -- Kind Regards, Dave Walker __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev