I like the thin container idea, and I am +1 too. But the only concern is that we MUST provide a robust migrate script( or Ansible role task) to do the convert stuff. Doesn't we have enough time for this?
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Michal Rostecki <mroste...@mirantis.com> wrote: > On 02/20/2016 05:39 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > >> Sam, >> >> I seem to recall Paul was not in favor, so there was not a majority of >> cores there. There were 6 core reviewers at the midcycle, and if you >> only count kolla-core (which at this time I do for policy changes) that >> means we had a vote of 5. We have 11 core reviewers, so we need a vote >> of 6+ for simple majority. I was also sort of –1 because it is an >> exception, but I do agree the value is warranted. I believe I expressed >> at the midcycle that I was –1 to the idea, atleast until the broader >> core review team voted. If I wasn't clear on that, I apologize. >> >> I'll roll with the community on this one unless I have to tie break – >> then groan :) >> >> That is why a decision was made by the group to take this to the mailing >> list. >> >> Regards >> -steve >> >> From: Sam Yaple <sam...@yaple.net <mailto:sam...@yaple.net>> >> Reply-To: "s...@yaple.net <mailto:s...@yaple.net>" <s...@yaple.net >> <mailto:s...@yaple.net>>, "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for >> usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> >> Date: Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 9:32 AM >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] port neutron thin containers >> to stable/liberty >> >> I was under the impression we did have a majority of cores in favor >> of the idea at the midcycle. But if this is a vote-vote, then I am a >> very strong +1 as well. This is something operators will absolutely >> want and and need. >> >> Sam Yaple >> >> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Michał Jastrzębski >> <inc...@gmail.com <mailto:inc...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Strong +1 from me. This have multiple benefits: >> Easier (aka possible) debugging of networking in running envs (not >> having tools like tcpdump at your disposal is a pain) - granted, >> there >> are ways to get this working without thin containers but require >> fair >> amount of docker knowledge. >> Docker daemon restart will not break routers - currently with >> docker >> restart container with namespace dies and we lose our routers >> (they >> will migrate using HA, but well, still a networking downtime). >> This >> will no longer be the case so... >> Upgrades with no vm downtime whatsoever depends on this one. >> If we could deploy liberty code with all these nice stuff, I'd be >> happier person;) >> >> Cheers, >> Michal >> >> On 20 February 2016 at 07:40, Steven Dake (stdake) >> <std...@cisco.com <mailto:std...@cisco.com>> wrote: >> > Just clarifying, this is not a "revote" - there were not enough >> core >> > reviewers in favor of this idea at the Kolla midcycle, so we >> need to have a >> > vote on the mailing list to sort out this policy decision of >> managing >> > stable/liberty. >> > >> > Regards, >> > -steve >> > >> > >> > From: Steven Dake <std...@cisco.com <mailto:std...@cisco.com>> >> > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage >> questions)" >> > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> >> > Date: Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 6:28 AM >> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage >> questions)" >> > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> >> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] port neutron thin >> containers to >> > stable/liberty >> > >> > Folks, >> > >> > There were not enough core reviewers to pass a majority >> approval of the >> > neutron thin container backport idea, so we separated it out >> from fixing >> > stable/liberty itself. >> > >> > I am going to keep voting open for *2* weeks this time. The >> reason for the >> > two weeks is I would like a week of discussion before people >> just blindly >> > vote ;) >> > >> > Voting begins now and concludes March 4th. Since this is a >> policy decision, >> > no veto votes are permitted, just a +1 and a -1. Abstaining >> is the same as >> > voting –1. >> > >> > > I'm +1, but under condition that we will provide some script to migrate > from supervisord-container to thin-containers (even if such a script will > bring risk of downtime of the cloud). > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Jeffrey Zhang Blog: http://xcodest.me
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
