On Wednesday 02 of March 2016 12:24:57 Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Sean, > > I do understand why we have tempest for python-cinderclient now. > > But my point is: tempest runs more than 200 tests per each cinderclient > change request which takes a lot of time. Why can't we just introduce few > integration tests which will tests nova<=>python-cinderclient API. > > Also, Nova is not only one consumer of cinderclient. What about Heat? We > don't want to break it too but to run all Heat-related Tempest tests is not > a good idea. We have to implement integration tests between Heat and > python-cinderclient too.
So you want to reimplement the tests you already have in Tempest? If the issue is the time, why not run a relevant subset of the tempests tests? Ciao -- Luigi __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
