On 03/02/2016 05:24 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
> Sean,
>
> I do understand why we have tempest for python-cinderclient now.
>
> But my point is: tempest runs more than 200 tests per each cinderclient
> change request which takes a lot of time. Why can't we just introduce
> few integration tests which will tests nova<=>python-cinderclient API.
>
> Also, Nova is not only one consumer of cinderclient. What about Heat? We
> don't want to break it too but to run all Heat-related Tempest tests is
> not a good idea. We have to implement integration tests between Heat and
> python-cinderclient too.
You can add any new tests that you want in additional test jobs.
Cinder can not remove the python-cinderclient src job anytime soon.
That's table stakes for being part of openstack given how deeply that is
coupled between Nova / Neutron / Cinder.
-Sean
--
Sean Dague
http://dague.net
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
