On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Salvatore Orlando <salv.orla...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11 March 2016 at 23:15, Carl Baldwin <c...@ecbaldwin.net> wrote: > I wonder if we could satisfy this requirement with tags - as it seems these > subnets are anyway operator-owned you should probably not worry about > regular tenants fiddling with them, and therefore the "helper" subnet needed > for the fip namespace could just be tagged to the purpose.
We discussed tags at the mid-cycle. We decided against using them. One reason is that tags are pretty new and are a moving target. Another reason I was hesitant is that tags were designed to be user facing. As I recall, we didn't want the tags to affect code behavior. But, maybe I misunderstood that. We want service types to affect IPAM, at least. Brian Haley is going to put up a spec for this service type attribute work. Brian, would you mind posting a link to your spec review when you've posted it? Carl __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
