On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The goal is to centralize the server expertise and have that be combined > with the folks who know how to better design a library for a good developer > experience (kind of like with osc). That said, I think the SDK would have > gained more traction if the OSC project had adopted it (which it is > hesistant to do given the troubles it has had with conflicting versions of > the service clients). > Actually it is simple timing. I didn't want OSC to require the SDK until they had a 1.0 release, but we went ahead and implemented Network commands using the SDK anyway because there were no compatibility issues. OSC pre-dates the SDK by at least 2 years... dt -- Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
