Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2016-04-09 06:42:54 -0700: > There is also disincentive in +1ing a change that you don't understand > and is wrong and then a core comes along and -1s it (you get dinged for > the disagreement). And there is disincentive in -1ing a change for the > wrong reasons (silly nits or asking questions for understanding). I ask > a lot of questions in a lot of changes and I don't vote on those because > it would be inappropriate. >
Why is disagreement a negative thing? IMO, reviewers who agree too much are just part of the echo chamber. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
