On 05/02/2016 08:07 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:
But, the original spelling of the landing site is Plimoth Rock. There were still highway
signs up in the 70's directing folks to "Plimoth Rock"
--Rocky
Who should know about rocks ;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Haley [mailto:brian.ha...@hpe.com]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 3:12 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?
There seems to be some vaugaries about which aligns with which. If the
Q naming alignes with Boston, I think it could be fun. The obvious one
is Quincy, but Quabbin (Reservoir) and lots of other Algonquin names are
in the running, too.
If it is P, there are many other options:
* Palmer <http://www.townofpalmer.com/> <http://www.palmerschools.org/>
* Paxton <http://townofpaxton.net/> <http://www.rmlpaxton.org/>
* Peabody <http://www.peabody-ma.gov/> <http://www.peabody.k12.ma.us/>
* Pembroke <http://www.townofpembrokemass.org>
<http://www.pembrokepolice.org/>
* Pepperell <http://www.town.pepperell.ma.us/>
<http://www.lawrencelibrary.org/>
* Peru <http://www.mass.gov/cc/peru.html> <http://perulibrary.selfip.com/>
* Phillipston <http://www.northquabbinchamber.com/>
* Pittsfield <http://www.pittsfield-ma.org/>
<http://www.berkshire.net/PittsfieldLibrary/>
* Plainville <http://www.plainville.ma.us> Schools
<http://www.plainville.mec.edu/>
* Plymouth <http://www.townofplymouth.org/>
<http://www.plymouthschools.com/>
* Plympton <http://town.plympton.ma.us/>
* Princeton <http://town.princeton.ma.us/>
<http://library.town.princeton.ma.us/>
* Provincetown <http://www.provincetown-ma.gov/>
And Providnece is, I think cliose enough for inclusion as well. And
that is just the towns.
Plymouth is the only County in Mass with a P name, but Penobscott ME
used to be part of MA, and should probably be in the running as well.
On 05/02/2016 02:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote:
Hi everyone,
When will we name the P release of OpenStack? We named two releases
simultaneously (Newton and Ocata) during the Mitaka release cycle. This gave us
the names for the N (Mitaka), N+1 (Newton), and N+2 (Ocata) releases.
If we were to vote for the name of the P release soon (since the location is now
known) we would be able to have names associated with the current release cycle
(Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P). This would also allow us to get back to
only voting for one name per release cycle but consistently have names for N,
N+1, and N+2.
Is there really going to be an option besides Plymouth? I remember something
important happened there in 1620 ;-)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plymouth,_Massachusetts
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
