Thanks for sending this out Matt. I added a inline comment here. On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> There are still a few design summit sessions from the summit that I'll > recap but I wanted to get the priorities session recap out as early as > possible. We held that session in the last slot on Thursday. The full > etherpad is here [1]. > > The first part of the session was mostly going over schedule milestones. > > We already started Newton with a freeze on spec approvals for new things > since we already have a sizable backlog [2]. Now that we're past the summit > we can approve specs for new things again. > > The full Newton release schedule for Nova is in this wiki [3]. > > These are the major dates from here on out: > > * June 2: newton-1, non-priority spec approval freeze > * June 30: non-priority feature freeze > * July 15: newton-2 > * July 19-21: Nova Midcycle > * Aug 4: priority spec approval freeze > * Sept 2: newton-3, final python-novaclient release, FeatureFreeze, Soft > StringFreeze > * Sept 16: RC1 and Hard StringFreeze > * Oct 7, 2016: Newton Release > > The important thing for most people right now is we have exactly four > weeks until the non-priority spec approval freeze. We then have about one > month after that to land all non-priority blueprints. > > Keep in mind that we've already got 52 approved blueprints and most of > those were re-approved from Mitaka, so have been approved for several weeks > already. > > The non-priority blueprint cycle is intentionally restricted in Newton > because of all of the backlog work we've had spilling over into this > release. We really need to focus on getting as much of that done as > possible before taking on more new work. > > For the rest of the priorities session we talked about what our actual > review priorities are for Newton. The list with details and owners is > already available here [4]. > > In no particular order, these are the review priorities: > > * Cells v2 > * Scheduler > * API Improvements > * os-vif integration > * libvirt storage pools (for live migration) > * Get Me a Network > * Glance v2 Integration > I saw the priorities review ( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/312217/ ) has been merged so wanted to point that out here. I know Nova team cares about history section of the specs so the dates are more clear from the links posted on the comment. To be more explicit: Glance v2 work (BP+code) was initially proposed in Icehouse, the co-located mid-cycle was in Kilo where we had a brief session on Glance v2 work (& thanks to all the Nova members who have been giving their input). Also, the reason for my comments/questions in the etherpad. > > We *should* be able to knock out glance v2, get-me-a-network and os-vif > relatively soon (I'm thinking sometime in June). > > Not listed in [4] but something we talked about was volume multi-attach > with Cinder. We said this was going to be a 'stretch goal' contingent on > making decent progress on that item by non-priority feature freeze *and* we > get the above three smaller priority items completed. > > Another thing we talked about but isn't going to be a priority is > NFV-related work. We talked about cleaning up technical debt and additional > testing for NFV but had no one in the session signed up to own that work or > with concrete proposals on how to make improvements in that area. Since we > can't assign review priorities to something that nebulous it was left out. > Having said that, Moshe Levi has volunteered to restart and lead the > SR-IOV/PCI bi-weekly meeting [5] (thanks again, Moshe!). So if you (or your > employer, or your vendor) are interested in working on NFV in Nova please > attend that meeting and get involved in helping out that subteam. > > [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-nova-summit-priorities > [2] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/090370.html > [3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Newton_Release_Schedule > [4] > https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/priorities/newton-priorities.html > [5] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-April/093541.html > > -- > > Thanks, > > Matt Riedemann > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev