On 10 May 2016 at 10:55, Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info> wrote: > On 05/09/2016 06:45 PM, Robert Collins wrote: >> IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki >> more would be a good start, and have zero infra costs? >> >> -Rob > > Well we are actually moving away from the wiki. Currently new accounts > are closed due to spammers using new accounts to spam the wiki. There > was not a whole lot of support in the room when we had the design summit > session on it: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-infra-wiki-upgrades for > continuing the wiki. The support was for moving away from the wiki, so > that is what we have agreed to do. > > We have some action items on the list including assessing current use of > the wiki and what kinds of items would present challenges as we move > away from it. The time line for the move is a year-ish but we really are > not enthused about new things moving onto the wiki at this time.
Thanks for the session link. From what I can tell it was advertised as being about wiki upgrades - something few folk who are not contributing to infra already are likely to attend, but ended up actually being about not-having-a-wiki, something which I think is a broad community question. What would be needed for infra to revisit the decision to deprecate the wiki, given the apparent interest from Nova and Swift to have one? -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hpe.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev