> -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] > Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 7:46 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs > > On 05/09/2016 06:37 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > > After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of > > these (some on the ML, some on etherpads, some on personal blogs); I am > > starting to wonder if we should again bring up the question of having > > infra (and I guess the foundation?) support/provide a place for team > > blogs... > > Honestly, I'm really liking that more of them are hitting the mailing > list proper this time around. Discoverability is key. The mailing list > is a shared medium, archived forever. >
[amrith] I sent some summaries to the ML after the summit and I think they were useful. One thing that I've found to be missing in the dissemination of notes from the summit is an acknowledgement. Not an acknowledgement of receipt but rather an acknowledgement of a commitment, an acknowledgement of a discussion or a decision. We have one construct that we rely on and that is gerrit review and I'm thinking that there is a class of these communications that we currently use the ML or etherpads for, and that we should instead wrap with gerrit review and an approval process. Something like this cross-project, maybe? Or is this a dumb idea (it's been a while since I've had one of those) ... > -Sean > > -- > Sean Dague > http://dague.net > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
