On 24.05.2016 19:05, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Markus Zoeller's message of 2016-05-24 11:00:35 +0200: >> On 24.05.2016 09:34, Duncan Thomas wrote: >>> Cinder bugs list was far more manageable once this had been done. >>> >>> It is worth sharing the tool for this? I realise it's fairly trivial to >>> write one, but some standardisation on the comment format etc seems >>> valuable, particularly for Q/A folks who work between different projects. >> >> A first draft (without the actual expiring) is at [1]. I'm going to >> finish it this week. If there is a place in an OpenStack repo, just give >> me a pointer and I'll push a change. >> >>> On 23 May 2016 at 14:02, Markus Zoeller <mzoel...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >>> >>>> TL;DR: Automatic closing of 185 bug reports which are older than 18 >>>> months in the week R-13. Skipping specific bug reports is possible. A >>>> bug report comment explains the reasons. >>>> [...] >> >> References: >> [1] >> https://github.com/markuszoeller/openstack/blob/master/scripts/launchpad/expire_old_bug_reports.py >> > > Feel free to submit that to the openstack-infra/release-tools repo. We > have some other tools in that repo for managing launchpad bugs. > > Doug
Thanks! I pushed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321008/ -- Regards, Markus Zoeller (markus_z) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
