On Aug 1, 2016, at 10:14 AM, Adrian Otto <adrian.o...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> I am struggling to understand why we would want to remove projects from our > big tent at all, as long as they are being actively developed under the > principles of "four opens". It seems to me that working to disqualify such > projects sends an alarming signal to our ecosystem. The reason we made the > big tent to begin with was to set a tone of inclusion. This whole discussion > seems like a step backward. What problem are we trying to solve, exactly? Many projects that are largely single-vendor are approved for the big tent with the understanding that they need to diversify. I believe that it is these types of projects that we are discussing. -- Ed Leafe __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
