Hi Yujun, From: Yujun Zhang Date: Monday, 29 August 2016 at 11:59
entities: - type: switch name: switch-1 id: switch-1 # should be same as name state: available relationships: - type: nova.host name: host-1 id: host-1 # should be same as name is_source: true # entity is `source` in this relationship relation_type: attached - type: switch name: switch-2 id: switch-2 # should be same as name is_source: false # entity is `target` in this relationship relation_type: backup I think that’s the idea, instead of making this assumption in the code. But I wonder why the static physical configuration file use a different format from vitrage template definitions[1] [1] https://github.com/openstack/vitrage/blob/master/doc/source/vitrage-template-format.rst What do you mean? The purpose of the templates is to describe the condition-action behaviour, wheres the purpose of the static configuration is to define resources to be added to vitrage graph. Can you please explain how you would make the formats more similar? Best Regards, Ifat.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev