Thanks for all your response. We would like to have the stable branch pulled from a git commit. Shall we use the git hash of that commit for the intended git hash in the release request?
I am confused about the following statement in the release guide. "You need to be careful when picking a git commit to base new releases on. In most cases, you’ll want to tag the merge commit that merges your last commit in to the branch. This bug shows an instance where this mistake was caught. Notice the difference between the incorrect commit and the correct one which is the merge commit. git log 6191994..22dd683 --oneline shows that the first one misses a handful of important commits that the second one catches. This is the nature of merging to master." What is meant by " tag the merge commit"? How do we tag a git commit on our master branch? Thanks, Cathy -----Original Message----- From: Ihar Hrachyshka [mailto:ihrac...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 4:22 AM To: Armando M. Cc: Cathy Zhang; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-sfc] need help on requesting release for networking-sfc Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 31 August 2016 at 17:31, Cathy Zhang <cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com> wrote: > CC OpenStack alias. > > > > From: Cathy Zhang > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 5:19 PM > To: Armando Migliaccio; Ihar Hrachyshka; Cathy Zhang > Subject: need help on requesting release for networking-sfc > > > > Hi Armando/Ihar, > > > > I would like to submit a request for a networking-sfc release. I did > this for previous branch release by submitting a bug request in > launchpad before. I see that other subproject, such as L2GW, did this > in Launchpad for mitaka release too. > > But the Neutron stadium link > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/stadium/sub_project_guidel > ines.html#sub-project-release-process > states that “A sub-project owner proposes a patch to > openstack/releases repository with the intended git hash. The Neutron > release liaison should be added in Gerrit to the list of reviewers for the > patch”. > > > > Could you advise which way I should go or should I do both? > > > Consider the developer documentation the most up to date process, so > please go ahead with a patch against the openstack/releases repo. Right. There was a recent change to the process that streamlined release requests and hopefully made them a tad easier for both subproject owners as well as release liaison. Please stick to the latest version of the process as described in devref in master branch of neutron repo. Ihar __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
