Option 2 sounds reasonable to me too. :) On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Akihiro Motoki <amot...@gmail.com> wrote: > What releases should we support in API references? > There are several options. > > 1. The latest stable release + master > 2. All supported stable releases + master > 3. more older releases too? > > Option 2 sounds reasonable to me. > > This question is raised in the neutron api-ref patch [1]. > This patch drops the API reference of LBaaS v1 which was dropped in > Newton release. > At least Newton is not released yet, so I think it is better to keep > it until Newton is released. > > I would like to get a community consensus before moving this patch forward. > > Thanks, > Akihiro > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/362838/ > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
