On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Alexander <alexander.bashma...@intel.com> wrote: > > FYI, >> >> A similar discussion was held for an api-ref change in Glance: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356693/ >> > > Thanks for the link, it led me to this discussion: > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-August/101501.html > > From the looks of it, seems like the result of the discussion is glance > folks tagging new API with micro-versions. In Neutron, we don’t have > micro-versioning, though we have /extensions API that would allow to detect > if a particular API is available. In particular case of dropping lbaasv1, > it would mean we keep reference for the API for some time while stating > it’s never available in Newton+? Glance does not have microversioning either. Yes, you need to keep the API reference for quite a long time (years). In one page, note that the API version for the service is not available for deployment in Newton+. Anne > > > Ihar > -- Anne Gentle www.justwriteclick.com
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev