Alon Marx wrote: > Thank you ALL for clearing up this issue. > > To sum up the discussion (not going into too many details): > From legal stand point, if one uses python libraries they should be part > of the community or confirming with the relevant licenses > (http://governance.openstack.org/reference/licensing.html). If one is > not using python libraries (e.g. rest, command line, etc.) the > non-python executable is considered legitimate wherever it is running. > From deployment stand point the desire is to have any piece of code that > is required on an openstack installation would be easily downloadable. > > We understand the requirements now and are working on a plan taking both > considerations into account.
I wouldn't say that the situation is cleared up -- we still need to get our act together and present a more uniform response to that question across multiple projects. But AFAICT your summary accurately represents the current Cinder team position on that matter. I hope we'll be able to hold a cross-project workshop on that question in Barcelona, so that we further clear up what is appropriate in-tree, as a separate project team and as an external project, across all of OpenStack. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
